Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983992›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Mechanistic Insights into Emulsion Destabilization by Electric Fields.

Alexandra Alicke, Nick O Jaensson, Jan Vermant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra AlickeDepartment of Materials, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nick O JaenssonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-5047
Jan VermantDepartment of Materials, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 5, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-0656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although stable emulsions are often desirable, in some applications, they must be destabilized. One common approach is to apply electric fields to promote droplet coalescence, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood due to the sometimes subtle interplay of hydrodynamics, capillarity, intermolecular forces, and both interfacial and Maxwell stresses. Here, we use a modified dynamic thin film balance technique to simulate electrocoalescence in two types of systems, namely "surface active" and "rheologically active" interfaces. Despite their distinct stabilization mechanisms, we find that the key factor influencing electrocoalescence is the same in all cases: the local film thickness, which directly affects the magnitude of the Maxwell pressure. For nonionic surfactant films, we identify two distinct regimes: (i) a hydrodynamics-dominated regime, where relatively small electric pressures (∼Pa range) are sufficient to break the film, and (ii) a regime in which intermolecular forces stabilize the Newton Black Film, increasing the required breakup pressure to the ∼ kPa range. Asphaltene-laden films, in the limit of insoluble interfaces, form a representative example of rheologically complex interfaces. We find that elastic properties stabilize these films at significantly larger thicknesses, rendering electric fields ineffective─unless demulsifiers are introduced to promote local heterogeneity and thinning. This study provides new insight into how electrostatic fields destabilize emulsions and suggests new avenues for developing more efficient destabilization strategies.

Identifiers

PMID40983992
PMCPMC12509331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.