ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Development and evaluation of a massive open online course (MOOC) to teach medical students the prudent use of antibiotics.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIf antibiotics are used appropriately, the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) can be curbed. Many medical students feel that they do not receive sufficient training in this respect during their undergraduate medical education. In recent years, digital learning formats are being successfully employed in student teaching. Our aim was to develop and evaluate a massive open online course (MOOC) on appropriate antibiotic therapy and the development of AMR. The intention was to provide the MOOC as an effective learning format in medical schools and to encourage others to develop their own MOOCs on other topics.
methodsWe developed a MOOC for medical students that consisted of four modules (M1-4) on bacteriology, microbiology diagnostics, pharmacology, antibiotics, AMR, the One Health approach, principles of appropriate antibiotic therapy, and transfer of knowledge to clinical practice. MOOC learners were asked to answer the same 16 knowledge and five self-assessment questions at the beginning and end of the MOOC and to give course feedback in an anonymous online questionnaire.
resultsFrom July 1, 2021 until June 30, 2022 the MOOC was actively attended by 2061 learners. Of them, 473 (23%) completed the final exam and 389 (19%) answered the knowledge and self-assessment questions at the beginning and end of the MOOC. A significant increase in knowledge and a strengthening of competence and self-confidence was observed in these 389 learners. The median knowledge score increased significantly from 10/16 (IQR 8; 12) points before the MOOC to 16/16 (15; 16) afterwards (p < 0.001). Overall, course activity decreased from M1 (100% attendance) to M4 (38%). At the end of the MOOC, the online feedback questionnaire was completed by 304 (15%) learners, most of whom rated the MOOC positively. For example, 97% of them stated that they had increased their knowledge in relevant areas.
conclusionsA high dropout rate for voluntary MOOCs is generally reported. Therefore, a course completion rate of 23% is acceptable. The learners who completed the MOOC showed a significant increase in knowledge and self-confidence. The use of the MOOC, or parts of it, as digital learning format for undergraduate medical education appears promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.