ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
The use of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arres : A retrospective study of the effects of administration timing and cumulative doses on outcome in a physician-staffed emergency medical service system.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association Between Epinephrine Administration Timing and Outcomes in Adult Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpinephrine administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been a long-standing recommendation, but the evidence is controversial. This study investigated effects of epinephrine administration in a physician-staffed emergency medical service (EMS) system and for the first time addressed the quality of chest compressions.
methodsComplete datasets of adult patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and received CPR were retrospectively analysed. Factors (time of collapse, bystander CPR, EMS arrival, initial cardiac rhythm, suspected cause of OHCA, and for the first time also quality of chest compressions) that may influence outcome (return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC], survival to discharge, neurological status) and epinephrine administration (time of first administration, total dose, route of administration) were analysed after adjustment.
resultsA total of 1141 patients were identified; 1090 patients were included. Patient data (age, gender, pre-existing conditions, initial electrocardiographic rhythm, suspected cause) were comparable to those reported in international studies. Mean chest compression depth was 5.5 cm (SD: 0.8 cm). Median compression rate was 115/min (SD: 12/min). The first epinephrine dose was administered after a mean period of 6:43 min after EMS arrival (SD: 9:30 min) and 18:23 min after collapse (SD: 11:13 min). Earlier epinephrine administration was associated with increased rates of ROSC and survival to discharge. Patients who achieved ROSC and survived to discharge received less than 6 mg of epinephrine. Early administration was associated with improved outcomes, especially in patients with asystole. Neurological outcomes, however, deteriorated with increasing epinephrine doses.
conclusionsThis study supports the benefit of early administration of limited doses of epinephrine in OHCA patients. Higher epinephrine doses may be associated with poorer outcomes. Further randomised controlled studies that investigate the administration of medications within fifteen minutes after collapse and also address the quality of basic life support measures are required to assess the actual benefits of epinephrine during CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.