Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983896›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Physician assistant for gynecology - exploring awareness and acceptance in Germany.

Sophia Andres, Katharina Hancke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia AndresDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany. sophiaandres@web.de.
Katharina HanckeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Physician Assistant (PA) bachelor's degree program has been available in Germany for several years, and PAs are progressively being hired and assigned to hospitals. Although the German Medical Association has developed a curriculum, the specific roles and potential duties of PAs in hospitals remain undefined. This study aims to explore the various applications and responsibilities of PAs within the field of gynecology.

methodsBetween December 2023 and February 2024, a cross-sectional, web-based, and anonymized survey was sent to gynecologists via the mailing lists of the Young Forum of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and through their Instagram account. A total of 120 surveys were collected, of which 97 were completed. The topics of the questionnaire were related to the expected integration of PAs in routine working tasks in the hospital.

resultsThis study shows that a significant proportion of respondents considered administrative duties (80%), blood sampling (95%), inserting intravenous catheters (95%), taking medical histories (81%), and conducting ward rounds under medical supervision (65%) to be suitable tasks for Physician Assistants (PAs). In contrast, procedures such as transvaginal sonography (22%), sonographic interventions (15%), and educational tasks (31%) were deemed unsuitable for delegation to PAs.

conclusionThe introduction of PAs in gynecology may be integrated into everyday clinical practice, but the specific tasks should be clearly defined. Establishing these conditions may have the potential to enhance job satisfaction for doctors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGynecologyPhysician AssistantsProfessional RoleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAreas of applicationGynecologyJob descriptionPhysician assistant (PA)

Identifiers

PMID40983896
PMCPMC12451998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.