Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983891›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2025

Experiences and perspectives of older adults in nursing homes and their families participating in advance care planning: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Yanping Li, Fang Li, Yuli Li, Qingbo Zhou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanping LiSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Fang LiSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Yuli LiSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Qingbo ZhouSchool of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China. 200062012768@email.sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

This research was funded by Jinan City-School Integration Development Strategic Project JNSX2023008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgainst the backdrop of an increasingly aging global population, improving the quality of life and end-of-life care for older adults has become a critical public health concern. Advance care planning(ACP) offers potential benefits, including enhancing the quality of end-of-life care, reducing unnecessary medical interventions, and alleviating the burden on family members. However, in the unique context of nursing homes, the willingness and actual participation of residents and their families in ACP are influenced by various factors.

aimThis systematic review and meta-synthesis aims to comprehensively explore the experiences, perceptions, challenges, and facilitators related to ACP participation among older adults and their families in nursing homes, in order to provide an evidence base for developing more effective ACP implementation strategies.

methodsA qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted to systematically review and synthesize existing qualitative studies, guided by the ENTREQ statement and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, The Cochrane Library, Sinomed, CNKI, and WanFang databases (from inception to October 2024) identified qualitative studies pertaining to the experiences and perspectives of nursing home residents and their families regarding ACP. The search was based on three key concepts: advance care planning, nursing homes, and qualitative research. Eligibility criteria included (1) participants being nursing home residents or their family members discussing ACP experiences; (2) studies published in English or Chinese; and (3) qualitative or mixed-method studies (qualitative data only extracted from mixed-methods). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. The data was synthesized using thematic synthesis method.

resultsA total of 1,097 articles were retrieved through database searches, and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Attitudes of older adults and their families towards ACP; (2) Individualized needs for ACP; and (3) Factors affecting the implementation of ACP. Most older adults and their families perceived ACP as a facilitator of emotional expression and communication and acknowledged its educational value. However, some family members expressed avoidance, ambivalence, or uncertainty toward ACP. Moreover, ACP was found to be highly individualized, with varying needs among participants. Key facilitators of ACP in nursing homes included the provision of clear and concise information, adequate cognitive functioning among residents, supportive policies, an open cultural environment, a compassionate multidisciplinary team, and strong trusting relationships.

conclusionAn increasing number of older adults and their families in nursing homes have recognized the value of ACP in facilitating communication and expressing care preferences. However, implementing ACP in these settings remains challenging due to cultural sensitivities around death and broader sociocultural influences. To improve ACP uptake in nursing homes, relevant authorities should strengthen legal frameworks and refine policy measures to enhance standardization and support the active participation of older adults. Tailored decision-support tools and materials should be developed to meet the diverse needs of nursing home populations. Additionally, the healthcare system should provide compassion-focused training to enhance staff empathy and promote interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningFamilyNursing HomesPerceptionAgedAged, 80 and overHumansQualitative ResearchAdvance care planningAdvance directivesFamiliesNursing homePalliative careSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40983891
PMCPMC12455779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.