ArticleMedical physics2025
Comprehensive characterization and validation of a fast-resolving (1000 Hz) plastic scintillator for ultra-high dose rate electron dosimetry.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global clinical landscape and multidisciplinary translational frontiers of FLASH radiotherapy: a systematic review and visualized bibliometric mapping based on WoSCC and PubMed (2014-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Conditional sparing in FLASH radiotherapy: Conformal dosimetry and ALARA remain essential.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A high-precision image-guided platform for studying spinal cord toxicity under ultra-high dose rate electron irradiation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive characterization and validation of a fast-resolving (1000 Hz) plastic scintillator for ultra-high dose rate electron dosimetry.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe normal tissue sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate irradiation (≥40 Gy/s, UHDR), as compared to conventional dose rate (CONV), has attracted significant research interest for FLASH radiotherapy (RT). Accurate, dose rate independent, fast-responding dosimeters capable of resolving the spatiotemporal characteristics of UHDR beams are urgently needed to facilitate FLASH research and support its clinical translation. Tissue-equivalent scintillators, with millimeter-level spatial resolution and millisecond-level temporal resolution, possess these required characteristics and show strong potential for use in UHDR dosimetry. PURPOSE: We investigated the performance of the HYPERSCINT RP-FLASH scintillator system at up to 1000 Hz sampling frequency (f
methodsThe scintillator was exposed to CONV and UHDR electron irradiation using a LINAC-based FLASH platform. Its spectral characteristics were delineated with a four-component calibration, followed by a signal-to-dose calibration using 18 MeV CONV electron beam. The dose linearity and dosimetric accuracy in response to CONV and UHDR irradiation at 1 and 1000 Hz f
resultsThe scintillator system at 1 Hz f
conclusionsWith routine dose calibration to account for radiation induced degradation, the fast-responding scintillator system can accurately provide millisecond-resolved inter-pulse measurements for electron beams at conventional and ultra-high dose rates, with minimal dependence on beam parameters. This suggests that the HYPERSCINT RP-FLASH scintillator system could serve as a detector of choice for electron FLASH research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.