ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation/Exsufflation Cough Assistance for Preventing Postoperative Pneumonia in Neurosurgical Patients: A Combined Physiological and Cohort Study.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication after neurosurgery, leading to worse outcomes. Although mechanical insufflation/exsufflation cough assistance (M-I/E-ca) may improve airway clearance, its safety and efficacy in this patient group remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate M-I/E-ca's impact on intracranial pressure (ICP) and hemodynamics and its role in preventing POP.
methodsThis study consisted of two substudies: a prospective physiological study to evaluate ICP and hemodynamic changes and a retrospective-prospective cohort study to assess the incidence of POP. The first substudy enrolled ten patients after neurosurgery, whereas the second included 200 patients, with 100 in the M-I/E-ca group (prospective) and 100 in the control group (retrospective).
resultsM-I/E-ca did not significantly alter ICP or hemodynamic parameters compared with the baseline. Instead, M-I/E-ca caused less disruption in ICP than traditional endotracheal suction, with insufflation/exsufflation pressure set at 40 mm Hg. The incidence of POP was 39%, with lower but not significant incidence in the M-I/E-ca (35%) compared with control (42%) groups (P = 0.309). In addition, patients in the M-I/E-ca group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (P = 0.006) and hospital (P = 0.002) stays compared with those in the control group.
conclusionsM-I/E-ca is safe for patients after neurosurgery, with no significant impact on ICP or hemodynamics. Although it did not significantly reduce POP, it may contribute to shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, suggesting potential benefits that warrant further investigation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40983845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.