ArticleBiotechnology letters2025
Bacterial cellulose production under agitated culture conditions using tobacco waste extract by a strain of Komagataeibacter sp. isolated from rotten mango.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to isolate an efficient bacterial cellulose (BC)-producing strain from rotten mango, optimize BC production though single-factor tests followed by Box-Behnken design (BBD) under agitated culture conditions using tobacco waste extract as the medium, and conduct the characterization of BC via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD).
resultsKomagataeibacter sp. XMZ1 with a high-efficiency BC biosynthesis capacity was successfully isolated from rotten mango. Subsequently, BBD was utilized to optimize the co-supplementation of lactic acid, ethanol, and yeast extract, demonstrating this statistical approach to be a reliable tool for both optimization and predictive modeling of BC yield. The optimized medium containing 2.1 g/L lactic acid, 1% (v/v) ethanol, and 2 g/L yeast extract resulted in a 2.1-fold enhancement of BC production, increasing the yield from 4.20 g/L to 8.85 g/L. The characterization of BC through FTIR, SEM and XRD revealed that BC produced under agitated culture conditions maintained similar chemical functional groups as the BC produced under static culture. However, the agitated culture products exhibited a more porous fibrillar network and a reduced crystallinity index.
conclusionThis present study provides valuable insights into BC production under agitated culture conditions by making use of tobacco waste. Additionally, it offers BC structural characterizations that are relevant to potential industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40983791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.