ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Radiofrequency and targeted ultrasound enhance natural hyaluronic production: a pilot porcine study.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoss of skin elasticity and youthful appearance is closely linked to reduced hyaluronic acid (HA) levels in the dermis. While topical HA products offer temporary effects, they do not address the root cause of HA depletion.
objectiveThe present study aims to describe how to induce HA synthesis through fibroblast stimulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve sows were divided into two groups. One group (n = 9) received four consecutive Radiofrequency (RF) and Targeted Ultrasound (TUS) treatments, the other group (n = 3) received four RF treatments only. Samples were collected via punch biopsy from the treated area of each animal at the baseline, 1-month, and 2-month follow-up. Samples were then processed and prepared for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as well as hyaluronic acid binding protein with diaminobenzidine (HABP-DAP) staining, which allows for visualization of HA within tissue.
findingsThe group receiving RF + TUS treatment has demonstrated an increase from an average of 83.0 µg/g at the baseline to 163.0 µg/g at the 2-month follow-up of HA concentration in the skin. Histology samples clearly demonstrate higher tissue density with an increase of brown pigment due to the HABP-DAP stain, representing HA in the skin. In comparison, the RF standalone treatment group has shown no significant increase in HA concentrations.
conclusionStudy results show no significant increase in HA production following the RF stand alone treatment. Whereas the RF + TUS treatment group induced a significant HA production response as well as histophysiological changes in the dermis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.