ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2025
Progress and challenges in sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxias.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroprotection Across Cerebellar and Nigrostriatal Degeneration: Translational Insights from Parkinson's Disease to Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Does CANVAS mimic MSA-C? A prospective multimodal study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Phenotype and Genetics of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 27B: Novel Movement-disorder Features, Cognitive Impairment, and Repeat Expansion Findings.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Genetic background shapes SEZ6L2 autoimmunity and reveals coordinated immune responses linked to neurological dysfunction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hereditary Ataxias: From Pathogenesis and Clinical Features to Neuroimaging, Fluid, and Digital Biomarkers-A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Epidemiology of progressive cerebellar ataxia in South Yorkshire, UK.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxia (SLOCA) is a syndrome defined by subacute or chronic and progressive ataxia occurring after the age of 40 years in individuals without a family history of ataxia. The 2022 publication of revised consensus diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy and the emergence of promising biomarkers provides a thorough diagnostic framework that now enables the diagnosis of numerous acquired causes of SLOCA, including autoimmune disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. The ongoing development and increased availability of DNA sequencing technology have uncovered several molecular causes of SLOCA besides spastic paraplegia type 7 and very late-onset Friedreich ataxia. These additional causes include sporadic genetic disorders, such as spinocerebellar atrophy type 27B, caused by GAA expansion in the FGF14 gene, and cerebellar ataxia with neuropathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS), caused by biallelic expansions in the RFC1 gene. This Review presents an updated clinical approach to the diagnosis and management of SLOCA that focuses on the most important developments in this field. Future challenges are also discussed, including the identification of additional missing genetic causes of SLOCA, especially via the use of long-read genome sequencing, improvements in SLOCA prognostication and the implementation of clinical trials of neuroprotective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40983776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.