Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983665›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2026

Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current pipeline and new opportunities.

Alvar Agusti, Dave Singh, Rosa Faner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Investigating human lung resilience, its evolutionary history and its relation to COPD.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alvar AgustiRespiratory Institute, Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. aagusti@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-3271-3788
Dave SinghUniversity of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rosa FanerUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory disorder of the lungs that affects about 10% of the adult population and is currently the third leading global cause of death. COPD is the result of multiple, repeated and dynamic gene-environment interactions, starting early in life, that determine the lung function trajectory that a given individual follows over a lifetime. Increasing understanding of COPD pathogenesis has opened many new opportunities for drug development, including recently approved monoclonal antibodies that reduce inflammatory cytokine signalling by targeting the IL-4α receptor or the eosinophil-activating IL-5. Drugs targeting a range of other culprits involved in COPD, including neutrophils, alarmins and kinases, are also in clinical development. As the current pipeline of drugs in development for COPD matures, potential areas for novel therapies continue to emerge while lessons from ongoing trials such as patient stratification can be used to refine the design of future trials in this disease.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.