Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983591›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Logistic Mixed-Effects Model Analysis With Pseudo-Observations for Estimating Risk Ratios in Clustered Binary Data Analysis.

Hisashi Noma, Masahiko Gosho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hisashi NomaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Statistical Mathematics, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-9949
Masahiko GoshoDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-9163

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22H03554Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23H03063Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23K11931Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K21306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Logistic mixed-effects model has been a standard multivariate analysis method for analyzing clustered binary outcome data, for example, longitudinal studies, clustered randomized trials, and multicenter/regional studies. However, the resultant odds ratio estimator cannot be directly interpreted as an effect measure, and it is only interpreted as an approximation of the risk ratio estimator when the frequency of events is small. In this article, we propose a new statistical analysis method that enables providing a risk ratio estimator in the multilevel statistical model framework. The valid risk ratio estimation is realized via augmenting pseudo-observations to the original dataset and then analyzing the modified dataset by the logistic mixed-effects model. The resultant estimators of fixed effect coefficients are theoretically shown to be consistent estimators of the risk ratios. Also, the standard errors and confidence intervals of the risk ratios can be calculated by the bootstrap method. All of the computations are simply implementable by using the R package "glmmrr." We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method via applications to a cluster-randomized trial of the maternal and child health handbook and a longitudinal study of respiratory disease. Also, we provide simulation-based evidence for the accuracy and precision of estimation of risk ratios by the proposed method.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalLogistic ModelsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansLongitudinal StudiesOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccase–cohort designclustered datageneralized linear mixed‐effects modelpseudo‐observationrisk ratio

Identifiers

PMID40983591
PMCPMC12454234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.