ArticleBMJ open2025
Latent profile analysis and influence factors of self-compassion among colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy from China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application and Efficacy Evaluation of a Modified Ostomy Appliance in Managing Peristomal Irritant Contact Dermatitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.International wound journal · 2025Trial
- Investigating the association between self-compassion and caregiving burden in caregivers of adults with cancer: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Perceived stress profiles, resourcefulness, and quality of life among patients with colorectal cancer and intestinal ostomy: a cross-sectional latent profile and mediation study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- [Latent profile analysis of psychological capital and antenatal depression among pregnant women].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was designed to explore the potential categories and their characteristics of self-compassion in Chinese enterostomy patients and then to investigate related factors.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingThe research focused on enterostomy patients who were hospitalised in two tertiary hospitals in Yangzhou City, China, between Nov 2022 and Aug 2023.
participants222 adult enterostomy patients in China completed the questionnaires. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This study investigated scores from the Self-Compassion Scale, Perceived Stress Scale and the Social Support Rating Scale. Information on the patients included: age, gender, marital status, monthly household income, types of medical insurance, education level, place of residence, enterostomy complications, postoperative time and whether adjuvant chemotherapy was given.
resultsThree profiles of self-compassion in enterostomy patients were identified: 'low self-compassion group' (class 1), 'moderate self-compassion group' (class 2) and 'high self-compassion group' (class 3), accounting for 40.5%, 28.0% and 31.5%, respectively. The multivariate logistic analysis showed adjuvant chemotherapy, social support (
conclusionsThere is significant heterogeneity in self-compassion among enterostomy patients, and nearly half of them belong to the 'low self-compassion group'. Focused interventions are required for females, patients with permanent enterostomy, low educational level and undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. The self-compassion ability of patients can be effectively improved by reducing perceived stress and enhancing social support. These findings provide a basis for constructing targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.