ArticleBMJ open2025
Randomised controlled study investigating standard dose continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus low-dose CRRT in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI): study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, international, multicentre trial (the 'Ketzerei' trial).
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06021288 (A Randomized Controlled Study Investigating Standard Dose Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Study Investigating Standard Dose Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) Versus Low-Dose CRRT - The "Ketzerei" Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Depletion of the Antioxidant Ergothioneine by Critical Illness and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Kidney and dialysis · 2026Article
- Balancing carbon reduction and treatment adequacy in sustainable continuous renal replacement therapy.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe only supportive therapy for patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication among the critically ill, is dialysis. Based on the literature and current guidelines, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with a total effluent dose of 20-25 mL/kg/hour and adjustments to ensure such dose is delivered despite down time (eg, due to surgical procedures) is recommended. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that azotaemia, which can be induced by lowering the effluent dose, may accelerate renal recovery. This clinical study investigates whether a lower effluent dose (10-15 mL/kg/hour) for a maximum of 7 days or until successful (>24 hours) liberation of CRRT in critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI accelerates renal recovery and reduces time on CRRT compared with guideline-directed standard dose (25-30 mL/kg/hour). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Ketzerei trial is an international, multicentre randomised, controlled trial, designed to investigate if a lower effluent dose (10-15 mL/kg/hour) accelerates renal recovery and reduces the time on CRRT compared with the guideline directed standard effluent dose (25-30 mL/kg/hour). The study aims to enrol 150 critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either a standard effluent dose (control group, 25-30 mL/kg/hour) or lower effluent dose (interventional group, 10-15 mL/kg/hour). The primary endpoint is the number of days free from CRRT and alive (from randomisation through day 28). Key secondary endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events due to potential uremia, the duration of RRT and intensive care unit survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ketzerei trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe (2023-343 f-s), the University of Muenster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06021288).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.