ArticleBMJ open2025
Pain in social context: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPain is an experience that is socially conditioned, like all human experiences. The scientific study of pain from a biopsychosocial perspective involves considering its complexity and multidimensionality. This means accounting for the anatomical and physiological elements of pain, as well as the psychological, social and cultural elements of pain. Despite the increasing acknowledgement of the biopsychosocial model, pain research still lacks standardised criteria for evaluating its social dimension. Moreover, the integration of social variables into empirical studies remains limited and fragmented. The aim of this review protocol is to analyse whether and how pain studies account for the social dimension, understood as the cultural, relational and contextual factors that shape the perception and experience of pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted by consulting five international databases: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scielo Citation Index, Scopus and CINAHL Complete. The review will include empirical or theoretical studies on pain that consider its social dimension, are written in Spanish or English, are applied to human beings and align with the review's objectives. The studies will then be exported to the Zotero bibliographic manager for further processing. The selection of studies will be carried out in two phases. The initial stage of the review process will involve a title and abstract analysis of the identified studies, followed by a full-text review. Data will be extracted using a bespoke tool created for this research. The quality of the studies will be assessed using a tool developed by our research group. Data synthesis will be carried out through descriptive and narrative analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review protocol did not require ethical approval; however, the project in which it is framed has been approved by the CSIC Ethics Committee (271/2023). These findings will be disseminated by publication in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals and by presentation at relevant scientific conferences and academic congresses. The results will provide an overview of the integration of the social dimension of pain into the scientific literature, thereby contributing to the advancement of the field and informing future research, interventions and public policy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024601863.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.