Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983544›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2025

Ultrasound Guidance Can Reduce IUD Insertion Time.

Nayoung Sung, Sally Wonderly, Verna Marquez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nayoung SungRio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program at Clinica Sierra Vista, Bakersfield, California nanayoung.sung@gmail.com.
Sally WonderlyRio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program at Clinica Sierra Vista, Bakersfield, California.
Verna MarquezRio Bravo Family Medicine Residency Program at Clinica Sierra Vista, Bakersfield, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether ultrasound (US)-guided intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces procedure time and pain compared to conventional methods. A quasi-randomized prospective study at a Federally Qualified Teaching Health Center enrolled a total of 50 IUD insertion cases. In the US-guided group (n = 25), IUD insertion was performed under transabdominal US guidance without uterine sounding and bimanual examination. In the conventional group (n = 22), insertion was followed by bimanual examination and uterine sounding. The procedure time was significantly shorter in the US-guided group (

Indexed as

Intrauterine DevicesUltrasonography, InterventionalAdultFemaleHumansProspective StudiesTime Factorscontraceptivesintrauterine device insertionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40983544
PMCPMC12459686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.