Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40983248›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2025

The effects of targeted reactivation on memories cued once or multiple times during a nap.

Matthew Cho, Sandhya Murugavel, Alison S Thiha, Eitan Schechtman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew ChoDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sandhya MurugavelDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Alison S ThihaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. Electronic address: eitans@uci.edu.

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansR00MH122663 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2023 to 2025
$933k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During sleep, memory traces are reactivated and consolidated into long-term memory. Discrete reactivation events involve coordinated activity between the hippocampus and neocortex. In this study, we examined whether the number of reactivation events directly translates to benefits to memory. To test this, we used targeted memory reactivation, a technique to selectively bias reactivation for certain memories by presenting non-invasive sensory cues. Participants (N = 31) completed a computerized object-location task, in which 60 images were presented along with related sounds. During non-REM sleep, 40 of these sounds were presented either once (20 sounds) or five times (20 sounds) in an interleaved fashion. Participants then completed another task designed to interfere with the previously encoded spatial memories, before being tested again on the initial object positions. The results showed no significant performance benefits for cued objects regardless of the number of sound presentations. This may be due to the interference task, which substantially increased error rates. Nevertheless, we found differences between the electrophysiological profiles linked with multiple vs. single sound presentation during sleep. Sigma spectral power predicted improvements in performance for the objects cued five times, but not for those cued once. For sounds presented once, benefits from sleep were predicted by post-sound power in the delta band. Although our results did not fully resolve the question of the relationship between the number of reactivation events and subsequent memory benefits, they inform future research using targeted memory reactivation to selectively bias memory during sleep.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCuesSleepSpatial MemoryAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultConsolidationEEGReactivationSpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID40983248
PMCPMC12490198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.