ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Awake prone lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion with simultaneous posterior decompression and fusion: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAwake spine surgery under spinal anesthesia may reduce perioperative risk in older or medically complex patients. This report presents the first documented case of an awake, single-position prone lateral transpsoas interbody fusion at L3-4 with simultaneous posterior decompression and fusion to treat a 77-year-old male with neurogenic claudication and mechanical back pain. A technical approach was developed to complete the procedure within the approximate 3-hour duration of spinal anesthesia. Prone positioning enabled simultaneous access to lateral and posterior corridors. Intraoperative navigation, dual-surgeon coordination, and patient-specific anesthetic planning were used to streamline the workflow. OBSERVATIONS: The procedure was completed within the spinal anesthesia window without the need for conversion to general anesthesia. The patient remained hemodynamically stable and tolerated prone positioning. No lumbar plexus-related complications occurred, and both clinical and radiographic outcomes were favorable. LESSONS: This case supports the feasibility of awake, single-position prone lateral lumbar interbody fusion with concurrent posterior decompression and fusion. It highlights key considerations for patient selection, anesthetic planning, and intraoperative coordination. Ongoing refinement of this technique may broaden its applicability in high-risk populations by balancing operative efficiency with the benefits of spinal anesthesia. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25467.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.