ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025
Capturing Objective Functional Measures Using Smartphone Inertial Sensors: Feasibility and Usability Study With Older Adults.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital platforms and smartphone apps have the potential to help patients with musculoskeletal conditions receive targeted interventions and physiotherapy support at home. As musculoskeletal conditions are much more prevalent in older adults, it is important to determine whether these technologies are accessible and acceptable to this demographic, who may possess lower levels of digital literacy compared to younger adults. Objective: The study aims to evaluate the feasibility and usability of completing functional assessments while recording the activity using smartphone inertial sensors in adults 60 years or older. Methods: Participants (N=21) were recruited from a range of community settings to complete a 4-week home-based trial, recording unsupervised sit-to-stand and single-leg balance activities at least once per week using their smartphone. We analyzed the data quality and adherence by number of assessments per week from the uploaded datasets. Feedback on usability was assessed using interviews and the System Usability Score. Results: Inductive content analysis was used to identify 5 top-level categories: app, device, task, time, and personal perception. The mean System Usability Scale score was 81.2 (SD 17.5). The proportion of valid data uploads was 63.8% (81/127) for single-leg balance and 93.5% (58/62) for sit-to-stand measures. Adherence was high, with no significant deviations in the mean number of sessions completed or duration between sessions. Conclusions: Smartphone-based monitoring of functional activities can facilitate unsupervised, remote assessments, thus reducing burden on physiotherapy services and increasing the ability to monitor progress objectively. Activities should be considered for complexity and, where necessary, increase in difficulty over time. App-based feedback is essential to inform users of the progress and adherence to the activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.