Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982802›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Early Treatment Outcomes for Multidrug-Resistant or Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis to Enhance Patient Cure Rates: Development and Validation of Multiple Models.

Fuzhen Zhang, Zilong Yang, Xiaonan Geng, Yu Dong, Shanshan Li, Cong Yao, Yuanyuan Shang, Weicong Ren, Ruichao Liu, Haobin Kuang and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fuzhen Zhang *Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-3886
Zilong Yang *Department of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Chest Hospital/ Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research/ State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2255-2700
Xiaonan GengDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1608-5235
Yu DongDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9635-5786
Shanshan LiDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-4536
Cong YaoDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9074-5469
Yuanyuan ShangDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3538-7730
Weicong RenDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1312-1110
Ruichao LiuDepartment of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4214-5988
Haobin KuangDepartment of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Chest Hospital/ Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research/ State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7254-5149
Liang Li *Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-5890
Yu Pang *Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis & Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6803-9807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly prediction of treatment outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) undergoing extended therapy is crucial for enhancing clinical prognoses and preventing the transmission of this deadly disease. However, the absence of validated predictive models remains a significant challenge.

objectiveThis study compared a conventional logistic regression model with machine learning (ML) models using demographic and clinical data to predict outcomes at 2 and 6 months of treatment for MDR/RR-TB. The goal was to advance model applications, refine control strategies, and boost MDR/RR-TB cure rates.

methodsThis retrospective study encompassed an internal cohort of 744 patients with MDR/RR-TB examined between January 2017 and June 2023, as well as an external cohort comprising 137 patients with MDR/RR-TB examined between March 2021 and June 2022. Data on culture conversion were collected at 2 and 6 months, and culture conversion was tracked in the external cohort at the same time points. The internal cohort was assigned as the training set, whereas the external cohort was used as the validation set. Logistic regression and 7 ML models were developed to predict the culture conversion of patients with MDR/RR-TB at 2 and 6 months of treatment. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsIn the internal cohort, culture conversion rates for MDR/RR-TB were 81.9% (485/592) at 2 months and 87.1% (406/466) at 6 months. The odds ratio for treatment success was 8.55 (95% CI 3.31-22.08) at 2 months and 20.33 (95% CI 6.90-59.86) at 6 months after conversion, with sensitivities of 86.5% and 92.2% and specificities of 57.1% and 63.2%, respectively. The artificial neural network model was the best for culture conversion at both 2 and 6 months of treatment, with areas under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.86) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were 0.74, 0.74, and 0.75 at 2 months of treatment and 0.80, 0.79, and 0.87 at 6 months of treatment, respectively.

conclusionsThe ML models based on 2- and 6-month culture conversion could accurately predict treatment outcomes for patients with MDR/RR-TB. ML models, particularly the artificial neural network model, outperformed the logistic regression model in both stability and generalizability and offer a rapid and effective tool for evaluating therapeutic efficacy in the early stages of MDR/RR-TB treatment.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsMachine LearningRifampinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsRifampinartificial intelligenceculture conversionmachine learningmultidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosispredictiontherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40982802
PMCPMC12501533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.