ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Digital Health Literacy in the General Population: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Digital Health Literacy in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Online Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Wearable Devices and Data Sharing in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Digital Engagement and Health Behaviors Among Village Health Volunteers in Southern Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence and disinformation in health: The need for re-education from primary care].Atencion primaria · 2026Review
- Health literacy and digital health service use among community residents in Taiwan: implications from a pilot assessment using the HLS-SF12.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The negative association between health status and digital health literacy among Chinese youth: a cross-sectional study on Chinese general social survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the rapid advancement of digital health technologies has significantly improved health management, digital health literacy (DHL) has emerged as a crucial determinant of health outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess DHL among Korean adults using a task-based assessment tool and to examine how sociodemographic and health literacy factors are associated with DHL, with the goal of identifying vulnerable groups and informing equitable digital health strategies. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from July 20 to July 31, 2022, among adults aged 19 years and older in South Korea. Participants were recruited nationally, with those younger than 55 years completing an online survey and those aged 55 years and older participating in face-to-face interviews to address the digital divide. Participants' DHL was assessed using the 34-item Digital Health Technology Literacy Assessment Questionnaire, a tool designed to evaluate practical task-based competencies. Results: Among 1041 Korean adults, 27.8% (n=289) demonstrated low DHL, with the largest gaps observed in mobile app use and critical evaluation of health information. The mean DHL score (on a 100-point scale) was 73.8 (SD 29.7). The high and low DHL groups scored 90.3 (SD 35.6) and 31.5 (SD 20.0), respectively. Specifically, only 49 (17%) of the low DHL group were able to sign up for an app, compared with 716 (95.2%) in the high DHL group. Similarly, 52 (18%) of the low DHL group could update an app, whereas 712 (94.7%) could in the high DHL group. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age (≥60 years), lower income (≤US $2000/month), unemployment, and inadequate general health literacy were significantly associated with lower DHL, highlighting the need to target modifiable factors beyond age. Conclusions: This study highlights the ongoing digital health disparities, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies in mobile apps and digital health technologies. Addressing modifiable factors such as health literacy is key to ensuring equitable access and the effective use of digital health resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.