Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982681›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context.

Rosa Martinez-Corral, Dhana Friedrich, Robert Frömel, Lars Velten, Jeremy Gunawardena, Angela H DePace

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosa Martinez-CorralDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-3601
Dhana FriedrichDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Robert FrömelCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-8677
Lars VeltenCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-5874
Jeremy GunawardenaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-1152
Angela H DePaceDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-0438

Funding

Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Eukaryotic Gene RegulationR01GM122928 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEPACE, ANGELA H, GUNAWARDENA, JEREMY · 2017 to 2024
$3.7M
European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) ALTF683-2019HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01GM122928Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) CEX2020-001049-S MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) PID2019-108082GA-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) PID2022-142210NA-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MCIU) RYC2021-033860-INational Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER IOS-1452557National Science Foundation (NSF) MCB-1715184NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) can be both activators and repressors of gene transcription. This can manifest as "duality," where the transcriptional response increases (activation) with TF concentration in one context but decreases (repression) in another context, or as "nonmonotonicity," where, in the same context, the response increases in part of the concentration range and decreases outside that range. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to investigate how duality and nonmonotonicity relate to the interactions between a TF, Polymerase and the regulatory DNA. We distinguish two modes of TF action on Polymerase: "coherent," with interactions either positive or negative, and "incoherent," where interactions are a mix of both. For TFs that act incoherently from a single TF-DNA binding site, nonmonotonicity can arise, but only under nonequilibrium models. For single-site models, we show that nonmonotonicity can never happen under the common thermodynamic models of gene regulation, which consider equilibrium conditions and ignore the dissipative nature of the transcription process. Moreover, we show that merely changing the TF-DNA binding affinity, while keeping other features fixed, can tune the response between activation and repression, with responses either evaluated as a function of TF concentration or site number. Using the mammalian Sp1 as a case study and synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for nonmonotonicity, and activation or repression tuned by affinity, which we interpret as evidence of incoherent action. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticTranscriptional ActivationTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticBinding SitesDNAThermodynamicsDNATranscription Factorsdualitygene regulationnonequilibrium regulationnonmonotonicitytranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID40982681
PMCPMC12501156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.