ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Emergence of activation or repression in transcriptional control under a fixed molecular context.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stable epigenetic states set single-cell activation thresholds in mammalian expression systems.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Dynamic neuro-immune regulation of psychiatric risk loci in human neurons.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Synthetic transcriptional repression systems in plants.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Nonconsensus flanking sequence of hundreds of base pairs around in vivo binding sites: statistical beacons for transcription factor scanning.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Lentiviral single-cell MPRA of synthetic enhancers reveals motif affinity-based encoding of cell state specificity.Genome biology · 2026Article
- In Depth Characterization of the Promoter Proximal Proteome of Single Copy Locus FOXP2.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Decoupling between activation time and steady-state level in input-output responses.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- An information content principle explains regulatory patterns of gene expression across human tissues.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Model-guided design of regulatable promoters for synthetic biology.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Bifunctional transcriptional effector domains control gene expression pulses in an occupancy-dependent manner.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Decoupling between activation time and steady-state level in input-output responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) can be both activators and repressors of gene transcription. This can manifest as "duality," where the transcriptional response increases (activation) with TF concentration in one context but decreases (repression) in another context, or as "nonmonotonicity," where, in the same context, the response increases in part of the concentration range and decreases outside that range. Here we use biophysical models of gene regulation to investigate how duality and nonmonotonicity relate to the interactions between a TF, Polymerase and the regulatory DNA. We distinguish two modes of TF action on Polymerase: "coherent," with interactions either positive or negative, and "incoherent," where interactions are a mix of both. For TFs that act incoherently from a single TF-DNA binding site, nonmonotonicity can arise, but only under nonequilibrium models. For single-site models, we show that nonmonotonicity can never happen under the common thermodynamic models of gene regulation, which consider equilibrium conditions and ignore the dissipative nature of the transcription process. Moreover, we show that merely changing the TF-DNA binding affinity, while keeping other features fixed, can tune the response between activation and repression, with responses either evaluated as a function of TF concentration or site number. Using the mammalian Sp1 as a case study and synthetically designed target sequences, we find experimental evidence for nonmonotonicity, and activation or repression tuned by affinity, which we interpret as evidence of incoherent action. Our work highlights the importance of moving from a TF-centric view to a systems view when reasoning about transcriptional control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.