ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2025
Comparative Effects of ZnO, MgO, and CaO Nanoparticles in 3D-Printed Chitosan-Agarose Scaffolds on Antibacterial and Osteogenic Outcomes.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopolymer-Nanoparticle Interactions in 3D-Printing for Biomedical Applications: Advantages, Limitations and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Comparative Effects of ZnO, MgO, and CaO Nanoparticles in 3D-Printed Chitosan-Agarose Scaffolds on Antibacterial and Osteogenic Outcomes.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of orthopedic surgery, large bone defects resulting from trauma, surgical resection, or congenital anomalies present significant challenges. In many cases, treatment necessitates scaffold structures that not only support bone regeneration but also address potential bacterial infections that can impede healing. In this study, we developed 3D bioprinted scaffolds using hydrogel-based biomaterial ink comprising a blend of chitosan (CS) and agarose (AG), each separately fortified with ZnO, MgO, and CaO nanoparticles (NPs). We performed a comprehensive assessment of the inks' printability and wettability, and ascertained their rheological properties. The in vitro degradation of 3D bioprinted scaffolds was analyzed, their antibacterial capabilities against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were explored, and the differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) was evaluated. The findings indicated that the hydrogel, CS-AG (CA), composed of 3.5% (w/v) CS and 1.5% (w/v) AG, demonstrated superior printing characteristics. Among the nanoparticles, ZnO proved to be a notable booster of antibacterial activity and facilitated osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of bone marrow stem cells. Conversely, MgO showed similar antibacterial efficacy but was less successful in promoting cell proliferation compared to ZnO and CaO, whereas CaO displayed the weakest antibacterial efficacy. The results identify the ZnO NP-loaded CA biomaterial ink as a viable option for addressing bone abnormalities, enhancing bone repair, and preventing bacterial infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.