ArticlePloS one2025
Harnessing interpretable novel combination of GloVe embedding with deep CNN-BiLSTM neural network for fake news detection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The important issue of fake news to society is how it affects how society runs in terms of decision-making and public perception. Hence, this study is a comparative analysis of innovative hybrid deep learning models and embedding techniques focusing on interpretability using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for fake news detection. The popular fake news dataset is used to design and test a collection of state-of-the-art models, such as GloVe with CNN-BiLSTM, FastText-Bi-LSTM, and logistic regression with TF-IDF against the CNN and GloVe with BiLSTM and CNN models. In terms of accuracy, LSTM without FastText shows a performance of 98.33%, whereas GloVe with BiLSTM and CNN shows a 99.63% performance. Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) is used to clarify how the input features make decisions on the high precision of the model. The integration of such state-of-the-art models with XAI is one of the major contributions of the study, which brings high accuracy as well as interpretability. Our study's perspective addresses model performance and user trust in the future, laying the foundation for the practical implementation of reliable fake news detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.