ArticlePloS one2025
A fusion safety and security analysis framework for intelligent and connected vehicles.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Driven by advancements in emerging technologies and data-driven innovations, the global automotive industry is focusing on intelligent and connected vehicles (ICVs), which involve complex electronic systems and vast data interactions. Safety concerns have expanded beyond traditional safety measures to include functional safety, safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF), and cybersecurity. Despite their interconnected nature, current methods often address these domains separately, risking incomplete safety assessments. This paper introduces a fusion safety analysis method that evaluates the three domains collectively. By identifying safety attributes and mapping unsafe behaviors to hazardous scenarios, it quantitatively assesses integrated safety risks. An illustrative case study on adaptive cruise control (ACC) highlights the method's effectiveness, stressing the importance of addressing multi-dimensional safety issues to enhance ICVs safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.