ArticlePloS one2025
A machine learning framework for estimating the probability of blacklegged tick population establishment in eastern Canada using Earth observation data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Effectiveness of Crowdsourced Data to Detect Established Tick Populations in Quebec, Canada: Retrospective Ecological Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ixodes scapularis ticks are the primary vector of Lyme disease (LD) in North America, and their range has expanded into southeastern and southcentral Canada with climate change. This study presents a comprehensive machine learning (ML) framework to estimate the probability of blacklegged tick population establishment as measured using active tick surveillance data. Environmental predictor variables were derived from Earth observation (EO) data at multiple spatial scales to assess their individual contributions in the prediction models. Among the tested ML algorithms, XGBoost emerged as the top-performing model, achieving high sensitivity (0.83) and specificity (0.71) in predicting population establishment. Performance was optimized when using predictor variables derived from a 1 km radius around surveillance sites. Top predictors included cumulative annual degree-days above 0°C and maximum temperature of warmest month, reflecting the importance of temperature in enabling tick survival and reproduction. Additional predictor variables of high importance included silty soil (lower clay content) with slightly higher than average SOC and pH, and land cover types that contained broadleaf forests (percent mixed forest, percent broadleaf) and less urban areas. By integrating ML with open access EO data, this study demonstrates that accurate, easily updatable risk maps can be produced to support public health management of LD, and more broadly, the growing threat of tick-borne diseases in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.