Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982459›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Active electroceutical treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected murine wounds.

Colin R Mack, Traci A Wilgus, Sheri Dellos-Nolan, Tony DiCesare, Daria Bentley, Fraser J Daniel, Vish V Subramaniam, Sahil Mahajan, Paul Stoodley, Daniel J Wozniak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Colin R MackDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Traci A WilgusDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Sheri Dellos-NolanDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Tony DiCesareDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Daria BentleyDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Fraser J DanielDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Vish V SubramaniamDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Sahil MahajanDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Paul StoodleyDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Daniel J WozniakDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Shaurya PrakashDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-0843

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel G. Stover · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic, infected dermal wounds have a high burden of cost and remain a persistent hurdle within healthcare. Electroceutical dressings that deliver antimicrobial agents directly to the wound site have emerged as an alternative solution to current standards of care. Here, through a systematic evaluation in an infected murine wound model we report on an actively powered electroceutical dressing that generates hypochlorous acid in situ as an antimicrobial agent to clear infection. In a significant new discovery, we also report that the treatment of these infected wounds with the actively powered electroceutical promotes the closure of wounds better than other test conditions. In a 10-day murine study, mice were wounded, and the dermal injury was infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Four treatment plans were administered to these wounds: no treatment, a commercially available electroceutical dressing, and our electroceutical dressing both powered and unpowered. The mice were subsequently sacrificed 8 days post infection. The powered electroceutical dressing demonstrated significantly reduced bacterial burden compared to untreated wounds. The powered electroceutical dressing also showed the highest wound closure with nearly 60% wound area reduction and approximately 36% percent re-epithelization of the wound bed in contrast to the no-treatment case. When compared against the other treatments, the powered electroceutical dressing demonstrated an improved capability in promoting wound area reduction while lowering infection burden.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsWound InfectionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBandagesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHypochlorous AcidMiceWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsHypochlorous Acid

Identifiers

PMID40982459
PMCPMC12453229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.