ArticlePloS one2025
Speech-in-noise discriminability after noise exposure: Insights from a gerbil model of acoustic trauma.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech comprehension, especially in the presence of background sounds, allegedly declines as a consequence of noise-induced hearing loss. However, the connection between noise overexposure and deteriorated speech-in-noise perception despite normal audiometric thresholds (hidden hearing loss) is not yet clear. This study investigates speech-in-noise discrimination in young-adult Mongolian gerbils before and after an acoustic trauma to examine the link between noise exposure and speech-in-noise perception. Nine young-adult gerbils were trained to discriminate a deviant consonant-vowel-consonant combination (CVC) or vowel-consonant-vowel combination (VCV) in a sequence of CVC or VCV standards, respectively. The logatomes were spoken by different speakers and masked by a steady-state speech-shaped noise. After the gerbils obtained the behavioral baseline data, they underwent an acoustic trauma and participated in the behavioral experiments again. Applying multidimensional scaling, response latencies were used to generate perceptual maps reflecting the gerbils' internal representations of the sounds pre- and post-trauma. To evaluate how the discrimination of vowels and consonants was altered after noise exposure, changes in response latencies between phoneme pairs were investigated in relation to their articulatory features. Numbers of intact inner hair cell synapses were counted, and auditory brainstem responses were measured to assess peripheral auditory function. Perceptual maps of vowels and consonants were very similar before and after noise exposure. Interestingly, the gerbils' overall vowel discrimination ability was improved after the acoustic trauma, even though the gerbils suffered from noise-induced hearing loss with a temporary threshold shift for frequencies above 4 kHz. In contrast, there were only minor changes in the gerbils' consonant discrimination ability. Moreover, noise exposure showed a differential influence on response latencies for vowel and consonant discriminations depending on the articulatory features. Altogether, the results show that an acoustic trauma followed by a temporary threshold shift is not necessarily linked to speech-in-noise perception difficulties associated with hidden hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.