ArticlePloS one2025
Vehicle avoidance: The hierarchy of visual attention towards animals, plants, and vehicles.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biophilia hypothesis posits that humans have an innate affinity for nature, with natural landscapes effortlessly capturing their attention, and a tendency to seek nature. The animate monitoring hypothesis suggests that humans have evolved to quickly detect and respond to animals for survival. The plant awareness disparity hypothesis argues that people notice plants less than animals due to perceptual biases and preferences. Based on these hypotheses, it was predicted that people's visual attention would be superior towards animals, plants, and manufactured objects, in that order. This study investigated the hierarchy of visual attention towards animals (birds, mammals and humans), plants (fruit), and manufactured objects (vehicles) using a dot-probe task framework. The findings revealed no significant differences in reaction time or attentional bias for animal or plant stimuli. In contrast, perceptual processing was inhibited when viewing a vehicle and attentional avoidance occurred, resulting in slower reactions than to animals or plants. These findings offer partial support for the proposed hierarchy of visual attention, suggesting that while natural stimuli such as animals and plants receive comparable attention, some manufactured objects may elicit perceptual avoidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.