ArticleBiomedical instrumentation & technology2025
Using a Risk Assessment to Transition to a 14-Day Endoscope Hang Time.
Article in Biomedical instrumentation & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines for endoscope hang time following device processing do not provide a specific time frame; instead, they recommend conducting a multidisciplinary risk assessment for any changes in protocol. After undertaking a risk assessment, a proposal to move from a 7- to 14-day hang time was developed and approved at a pediatric hospital. Rigorous protocols were put into place to assess for endoscope contamination and to surveil for endoscope-related infections. In the 3 months following the protocol change, no instances of contamination were identified and no concerns related to endoscope-related infections were noted. Implementation of the increase in scope hang time was estimated to save more than $150,000 annually in equipment and staff costs. Modifying endoscope hang time can be accomplished safely and cost effectively by adhering to strict procedures and ensuring dedicated process oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.