Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982284›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Efficacy and Safety of Ammoxetine in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shen He, Jing-Xu Chen, XueQin Yu, Huali Lin, ZhiQiang Wang, Xuan Li, Yanan Zhou, Yan-Song Liu, Hongyan Zhang, Jicai Wang and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05762458 (Efficacy and Safety of Ammoxetine Hydrochloride Enteric-coated Tablets in Subjects With Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05762458 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Ammoxetine Hydrochloride Enteric-coated Tablets in Subjects With Depression: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase Ⅱ Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.Ran2023 to 2024Enrolled240ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)ArmsAmmoxetine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shen HeDepartment of Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing-Xu ChenSleep Medicine Center, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.
XueQin YuChongqing Mental Health Center, Chongqing, China.
Huali LinXi'an Mental Health Center, Xi'an, China.
ZhiQiang WangWuxi Mental Health Center, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Xuan LiGuangzhou Medical University Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanan ZhouDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South; University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yan-Song LiuDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hongyan ZhangPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jicai WangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Cuixia AnDepartment of Clinical Psychology, First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Hao LiuDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Wuhan University People's Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Chao LiCSPC Pharmaceutical Group Co Ltd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Shaonan NiCSPC Pharmaceutical Group Co Ltd, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Huafang LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is among the most prevalent mental health disorders, causing substantial disability and economic burden. Although several first-line treatments exist with mild adverse effects, up to 50% to 60% of patients do not tolerate or respond to them. Ammoxetine, a novel selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been found to reduce adverse effects and hepatotoxicity and more potent inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine transporters, making it more tolerable and effective. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ammoxetine in treating adults with MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study of ammoxetine treatment in patients with MDD in China. Patients aged 18 to 65 years from 15 study centers were randomized into daily ammoxetine or placebo groups between March 27, 2023, and June 13, 2024, and followed up for 10 weeks. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to 3 treatment groups: ammoxetine 40 mg/d, ammoxetine 60 mg/d, and placebo. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was change in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to 8 weeks. Efficacy analyses were performed on both the full-analysis and per-protocol sets using least-squares (LS) mean differences. The safety set analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: Among 239 enrolled patients (mean [SD] age, 30.4 [10.0] years, 158 female [66.1%]), 80 were randomized to the ammoxetine 60 mg/d group, 80 to the ammoxetine 40 mg/d group, and 79 to the placebo group. In the full-analysis set, both ammoxetine doses led to statistically significant improvements in MADRS total scores at week 8 compared with placebo. The LS mean changes (SE) from baseline were -16.7 (1.3) for ammoxetine 40 mg/d, -16.6 (1.3) for ammoxetine 60 mg/d, and -13.5 (1.3) for placebo. The differences vs placebo were -3.3 (97.3 CI, -6.3 to -0.3) for ammoxetine 40 mg/d and -3.1 (97.3% CI, -6.2 to 0.0) for ammoxetine 60 mg/d. Consistent results were observed in the per-protocol set analysis at week 8 for ammoxetine 40 mg/d (LS mean change, -3.2; 97.3% CI, -6.2 to -0.2) and ammoxetine 60 mg/d (LS mean change, -3.18; 97.3% CI, -6.2 to -0.2), both superior to placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 68 participants (85.0%) receiving ammoxetine 60 mg/d, 63 (78.8%) receiving ammoxetine 40 mg/d, and 48 (60.8%) receiving placebo; most were mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated superiority over placebo of ammoxetine treatment at both 40 mg/d and 60 mg/d in patients with MDD. In addition, all doses of ammoxetine were generally well tolerated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05762458.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMorpholinesSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAdolescentAdultAgedBenzodioxolesChinaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropylaminesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultammoxetineBenzodioxolesMorpholinesPropylaminesSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40982284
PMCPMC12455369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.