ArticleJAMA network open2025
Factors in the Initial Resuscitation of Patients With Severe Trauma: The FiiRST-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04534751 (Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-control, Superiority Study Comparing Administration of Clotting Factor Concentrates With a Standard Massive Hemorrhage Protocol in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-control, Superiority Study Comparing Administration of Clotting Factor Concentrates With a Standard Massive Hemorrhage Protocol in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Hemorrhagic Shock: Biological Rationale for Individualized Fluid Resuscitation Strategies and Multimodal Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Best practices on blood and blood products for a prehospital hemorrhage protocol: consensus from the 2025 Canadian prehospital transfusion summit.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence of ROTEMEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Observational
- Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in the Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: A Clinical Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Error in the Byline.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- An analysis of blood transfusion practices in gunshot wound patients at a peripheral trauma-blood centre unit.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with bleeding and coagulopathic trauma often require more transfusions and have higher mortality rates, motivating research on improving hemostatic strategies. Objective: To evaluate the replacement of clotting factors with frozen plasma (FP) or factor concentrates (fibrinogen concentrate [FC] and prothrombin complex concentrate [PCC]) in the initial resuscitation of patients with trauma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, parallel-control, superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 level I trauma centers in Canada, between April 2021 and February 2023. Eligible patients were those with massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) activation on admission and aged 16 years or older. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 red blood cell (RBC) units either before hospital admission or in the hospital prior to randomization or if they had a catastrophic head injury. Follow-up was completed on March 25, 2023. The primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat approach. Interventions: The intervention group received FC 4 g and PCC 2000 IU in MHP packs 1 and 2. The control group received 4 FP units. Concurrently, patients received 4 RBC units (both packs) and 1 dose of platelets (pack 2). After pack 2, FP was administered at clinician discretion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the number of allogeneic blood product (RBC, FP, and platelet) units administered within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included incidence of thromboembolic events, duration of intensive care unit stay, and mortality. Results: Of the 217 patients enrolled, 107 were randomly assigned to the FC-PCC group and 110 to the FP group; 137 patients were included in the primary analysis (66 in the FC-PCC group and 71 in the FP group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (median [IQR] age, 38 [29-55] years; 111 males [81.0%]). Among these patients, 95 (69.3%) had blunt mechanisms of injury, and the median (IQR) Injury Severity Score was 29 (19-43). Mean 24-hour transfusions were 20.8 (95% CI, 16.7-25.9) units in the FC-PCC group and 23.8 (95% CI, 19.2-29.4) units in the FP group. The mean ratio was 0.87 (1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-1.19; P = .20 for superiority). No significant differences were found in thromboembolic complications or 24-hour and 28-day mortality. The trial was terminated after the interim analysis showed conditional power of less than 25%, requiring an impractically large sample to show superiority. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, clotting factor concentrates were not superior to FP for initial resuscitation of patients with trauma. Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar across the treatment groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04534751.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.