ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Development of a patient-specific cone-beam computed tomography dose optimization model using machine learning in image-guided radiation therapy.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly utilized in radiation therapy to visualize soft tissues and bone structures. This study aims to develop a machine learning model that predicts optimal, patient-specific CBCT doses that minimize radiation exposure while maintaining soft tissue image quality in prostate radiation therapy. Phantom studies evaluated the relationship between dose and two image quality metrics: image standard deviation (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In a prostate-simulating phantom, CNR did not significantly decrease at doses above 40% compared to the 100% dose. Based on low-contrast resolution, this value was selected as the minimum clinical dose level. In clinical image analysis, both SD and CNR degraded with decreasing dose, consistent with the phantom findings. The structural similarity index between CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) significantly decreased at doses below 60%, with a mean value of 0.69 at 40%. Previous studies suggest that this level may correspond to acceptable registration accuracy within the typical planning target volume margins applied in image-guided radiotherapy. A machine learning model was developed to predict CBCT doses using patient-specific metrics from planning CT scans and CBCT image quality parameters. Among the tested models, support vector regression achieved the highest accuracy, with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.