Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982207›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Development of a patient-specific cone-beam computed tomography dose optimization model using machine learning in image-guided radiation therapy.

Shuta Miura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shuta MiuraDepartment of Radiology, Akita Kousei Medical Center, 1-1-1 Iijima Nishibukuro, Akita, 011-0948, Japan. dirsiamciel50@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly utilized in radiation therapy to visualize soft tissues and bone structures. This study aims to develop a machine learning model that predicts optimal, patient-specific CBCT doses that minimize radiation exposure while maintaining soft tissue image quality in prostate radiation therapy. Phantom studies evaluated the relationship between dose and two image quality metrics: image standard deviation (SD) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In a prostate-simulating phantom, CNR did not significantly decrease at doses above 40% compared to the 100% dose. Based on low-contrast resolution, this value was selected as the minimum clinical dose level. In clinical image analysis, both SD and CNR degraded with decreasing dose, consistent with the phantom findings. The structural similarity index between CBCT and planning computed tomography (CT) significantly decreased at doses below 60%, with a mean value of 0.69 at 40%. Previous studies suggest that this level may correspond to acceptable registration accuracy within the typical planning target volume margins applied in image-guided radiotherapy. A machine learning model was developed to predict CBCT doses using patient-specific metrics from planning CT scans and CBCT image quality parameters. Among the tested models, support vector regression achieved the highest accuracy, with an R

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMachine LearningRadiation DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCBCT dose reductionDose optimizationImage-guided radiation therapyMachine learningPatient-specific protocolProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.