ArticleOral radiology2026
The optimal diagnostic assistance system for predicting three-dimensional contact between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify the most effective diagnostic assistance system for assessing the relationship between mandibular third molars (M3M) and mandibular canals (MC) using panoramic radiographs.
methodsIn total, 2,103 M3M were included from patients in whom the M3M and MC overlapped on panoramic radiographs. All M3M were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the degree of contact with the MC observed on computed tomography. The contact classification was evaluated using four machine learning models (Prediction One software, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and random forest), three convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (EfficientNet-B0, ResNet18, and Inception v3), and three human observers (two radiologists and one oral surgery resident). Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted; the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Factors contributing to prediction of high-risk cases by machine learning models were identified.
resultsMachine learning models demonstrated AUC values ranging from 0.84 to 0.88, with accuracy ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 and sensitivity of 0.80, indicating consistently strong performance. Among the CNNs, ResNet18 achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.83. The human observers exhibited AUC values between 0.67 and 0.80. Three factors were identified as contributing to prediction of high-risk cases by machine learning models: increased root radiolucency, diversion of the MC, and narrowing of the MC.
conclusionMachine learning models demonstrated strong performance in predicting the three-dimensional relationship between the M3M and MC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982205What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.