Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982204›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Machine learning model for predicting a high comprehensive complication index following rectal cancer surgery.

Zhen Wang, Lei Huang, Liang He, Shuang Li, Siyu Peng, Yang Gong, Dongmei Mu, Quan Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhen WangDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Lei HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Liang HeDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Shuang LiDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Siyu PengDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yang GongDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Dongmei MuDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Quan WangDepartment of Gastrocolorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. wquan@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-1508

Funding

Jilin Provincial Department of Science and Technology YDZJ202402012CXJDthe First Hospital of Jilin University and Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, CAS, Joint Laboratory of Medicine and Polymers Project 2022YYGFZJC0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative complications following rectal cancer surgery can significantly affect patient's health and prognosis. It has been reported that the comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive assessment tool for severe complications than the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) system. This study aims to construct a predictive model for high postoperative CCI using machine learning methods to guide clinical practice. A total of 1029 patients with mid and low rectal cancer who underwent rectal resection were included. Preoperative, intraoperative clinicopathological characteristics and pelvic measurement data were collected. Five predictive models were constructed using machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), LightGBM, Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes Model (NBM) and XGBoost, and their performances were compared. Finally, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to visually interpret the predictive variables of the best model. Six predictive variables, including surgical time, interspinous distance, pelvic depth, age, diabetes, and tumor distance, were included in the model construction. Among the five models, LightGBM was the optimal model, with an AUC of 0.746 in the training set, 0.760 in the testing set and 0.709 in the validation set. It had the best DCA curve for most thresholds, indicating excellent performance in predicting high CCI. This study developed a predictive model for assessing the risk of high CCI following anterior resection for rectal cancer. It could provide personalized treatment strategies for patients at high risk of severe complications, improves patient prognosis, and promotes its use through an online web tool ( https://mypredict.shinyapps.io/CDC_CCI/ ).

Indexed as

Machine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsColorectal Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRisk AssessmentComprehensive complication indexMachine learningNarrow pelvicPrediction modelRectal cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.