Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982197›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025

Defining the public in public health after Lalonde: the view from the United Kingdom, 1970s‒1990s.

Alex Mold

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alex MoldSchool of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England. Alex.Mold@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9674-9953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article considers the impact of the Lalonde report on ideas about the public and public health in the United Kingdom from the 1970s to the 1990s. It begins by assessing how "the public" within the context of public health has been thought of. Three key modes are identified: the public as the whole population, as groups, and as individuals. An examination of the Lalonde report, and its British equivalent, Prevention and Health, Everybody's Business, points to the presence of these three ways of thinking about the public. Nonetheless, the role of the individual in disease prevention appeared to dominate both the Lalonde report and Prevention and Health. The influence of this approach is traced through an analysis of British health education campaigns around alcohol from the 1970s to the early 1990s. The target of such efforts changed over time, away from alcoholics and heavy drinkers and towards creating "sensible drinkers". Although alcohol health education campaigns were directed at getting individuals to change their drinking behaviour, they also took into account a population-level view of alcohol consumption. The current article concludes by suggesting that a reappraisal of Lalonde and Prevention and Health points to the existence of collective, as well as individual-based, ways of thinking about publics and doing public health.

Indexed as

Public HealthAlcohol DrinkingHealth EducationHealth PromotionHistory, 20th CenturyHumansUnited KingdomAlcoolÉducation sanitairePromotion de la santéRisque

Identifiers

PMID40982197
PMCPMC12483010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.