Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982194›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025

"Insidious habits": The moral vision of the Lalonde Report in historical perspective.

Catherine Carstairs

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Catherine CarstairsCollege of Arts, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada. ccarstai@uoguelph.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6054-0661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Lalonde Report, A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, is rightly celebrated as an important Canadian contribution to the development of health promotion. It introduced the "Health Field Concept"-the idea that health was the result of human biology, health care systems, the environment, and lifestyle. Although the health field concept was new, the report drew on a long tradition within public health of blaming individuals for their own health problems. With less evidence, some scholars have also made the case for the Lalonde Report contributing to the social determinants of health. But A New Perspective paid little attention to the systemic barriers that prevented people from eating well, exercising, drinking less, or quitting smoking. While it occasionally acknowledged the constraints of poverty, the focus was much more on people's individual responsibility to improve their health. This paper contextualizes the Lalonde Report in the longer history of public health campaigns in Canada and shows the extent to which the Lalonde Report was a product of its time, age, and authors. At the end, the paper will address the intellectual origins of the social determinants of health and argue that the Lalonde Report made only a marginal contribution to the social determinants of health.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMoralsPublic HealthSocial Determinants of HealthCanadaHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansHistoryLalonde ReportSocial determinants of healthVictim blaming

Identifiers

PMID40982194
PMCPMC12483007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.