Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982167›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025

Repeatability of diffusion and perfusion MRI derived radiomic features in glioblastoma: a test-retest study.

Philip Martin, Lois Holloway, Peter Metcalfe, Eng-Siew Koh, Farhannah Aly, Edward Chan, Caterina Brighi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip MartinUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. pm603@uowmail.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2514-2581
Lois HollowayIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
Peter MetcalfeUniversity of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Eng-Siew KohIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
Farhannah AlyIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
Edward ChanDepartment of Radiology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
Caterina BrighiIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.

Funding

Southwestern Sydney Local Health District APP1132471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An understanding of the repeatability of imaging biomarkers is key to their implementation as clinical tools. In this study we calculate the repeatability and inter-correlation of radiomic features derived from quantitative MRI (qMRI) of Glioblastoma (GBM) patients and assess the effect of image standardisation methods on these factors. We analysed scan-rescan Diffusion Weighted MR Images (DWI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Images (DCE) from 36 GBM patients obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). These included 17 patients, from the QIN-GBM-Treatment-Response patient cohort, scanned post surgery and prior to chemo-radiation therapy and 19 patients, from the RIDER Neuro MRI patient cohort, scanned at diagnosis of tumour recurrence. For both patient cohorts, two sets of scans were taken 2-6 days apart. Each of these patient cohorts was analysed independently to determine if findings were consistent across different acquisition parameters. Parametric maps of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) were obtained from DWI and DCE data, respectively. Intensity normalisation and noise filtering were applied to the parametric maps in multiple permutations to give 7 distinct standardisation methods. Shape, first order and second order radiomic features for the parametric maps were calculated within the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV). The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated between the feature value at each imaging timepoint. The ICC of first and second order features derived from images with each standardisation method was compared to the ICC of corresponding features derived from images without standardisation. Based on the average ICC of features derived from ADC images without image standardisation, first order features were the most repeatable in both patient cohorts. For ADC derived features in the QIN cohort, shape features were the second most repeatable followed by second order features. For ADC derived features in the RIDER cohort, second order features were the second most repeatable followed by shape features. In CBV images, shape features were the most repeatable followed by second order and then first order in both patient cohorts. No image standardisation method implemented in this study was found to significantly increase the repeatability of ADC-derived first or second order features. For first order CBV features z-score normalisation without noise filtering produced a significant improvement in feature repeatability in both patient cohorts. Radiomic feature repeatability is impacted by feature class. Image standardisation methods implemented in this study were not found to be effective at improving the repeatability of ADC-derived features and had limited utility for improving CBV derived features. Future radiomic studies should consider feature repeatability as an important factor in feature selection.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGlioblastomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsApparent diffusion coefficientDynamic contrast enhanced MRIQuantitative MRIRadiomicsRepeatability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.