Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982147›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025

Clinical-radiomic prognostic model integrating staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

Yizhou Wei, Siwei Pan, Yahan Tong, Guoliang Zheng, Mengxuan Cao, Yanqiang Zhang, Ruolan Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Qing Yang, Ke Shen and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yizhou Wei *Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Siwei Pan *Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Yahan Tong *Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Guoliang Zheng *Department of Gastric Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning, China.
Mengxuan CaoDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Yanqiang ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ruolan ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Weiwei ZhuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Qing YangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ke ShenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Mengya ZhouDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Ruixin XuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Jintao HeDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Jiancheng SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang, China.
Zhiyuan XuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Xiangdong ChengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Can HuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. hucan@zjcc.org.cn.

Funding

Healthy Zhejiang One Million People Cohort K-20230085Medicine and Health Science Fund of Zhejiang Province Health Commission 2025KY047National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFA0910100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82304946National Natural Science Foundation of China 82403546National Natural Science Foundation of China 82473489Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LR21H280001Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province ZCLQN25H1602Post-doctoral Innovative Talent Support Program BX2023375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor regression grade (TRG) and ypTNM are primarily employed to evaluate the efficacy of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in gastric cancer (GC) patients, however, have limited prognostic value. In this study, we established a clinical-radiomic fusion model, without TRG information, for better prognosis assessment of patients following NAC.

methodsA retrospective multicenter study comprising 875 GC patients from three centers was conducted. Cox hazard regression model was used for variable screening and risk weight assignment. Lasso regression was applied for dimensionality reduction and screening of radiomic features. Models were constructed for better prognosis assessment, and were verified in external cohorts.

resultsSurvival analysis showed that dynamic T/N staging changes after NAC could effectively distinguish patients based on prognosis. Moreover, the Clinical SCORE model based on the dynamic T/N staging changes and other clinicopathological data had also been found in internal and external validations to be capable of effectively stratifying patients' risks. For CT images, the identified radiomics features were employed to establish the CT SCORE model, which was subsequently integrated with the Clinical SCORE model to construct the Final SCORE model for prognostic evaluation. In the training and validation cohorts, the prognostic discrimination performance of the Final SCORE model exceeded that of TRG and ypTNM. Furthermore, the final model might also be helpful for the screening of the population benefiting from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

conclusionThe developed clinical-radiomic Final SCORE model showed superior prognostic assessment performance than TRG and ypTNM for prognostic assessment of GC patients following NAC.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTomography, X-Ray ComputedGastric cancerNeoadjuvant therapyPrognosisRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.