Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40982124›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2026

Global Genomic Surveillance: On-The-Ground Responses.

Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara, Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis, Marta Giovanetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luiz Carlos Junior AlcantaraRene Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Maria Bispo de FilippisLaboratório de Arbovírus e Vírus Hemorrágicos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marta GiovanettiRene Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. giovanetti.marta@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic surveillance has emerged as a fundamental tool in the global response to dengue virus (DENV), enabling the rapid detection of viral strains, monitoring of transmission dynamics, and assessment of evolutionary changes that may impact disease control strategies. This chapter examines the critical role of genomic surveillance in addressing the ongoing dengue crisis, highlighting its contributions to outbreak detection, strain characterization, and vaccine efficacy assessments. We provide a comparative analysis of regional approaches to genomic surveillance, emphasizing disparities in infrastructure, sequencing capacity, and data-sharing frameworks across different epidemiological settings. Despite its transformative potential, the implementation of genomic surveillance faces significant challenges, including logistical constraints, limited sequencing accessibility in resource-limited settings, and issues related to data integration and public health decision-making. We discuss these barriers and propose strategies to enhance genomic surveillance efforts, such as strengthening international collaborations, fostering capacity-building initiatives, and integrating real-time sequencing technologies with epidemiological and ecological modeling. Finally, we explore future directions in genomic surveillance, advocating for a more coordinated and sustainable approach to genomic data generation and utilization, ultimately improving global preparedness and response to dengue and other emerging arboviruses.

Indexed as

DengueDengue VirusEpidemiological MonitoringGenomicsAnimalsDisease OutbreaksGenome, ViralGlobal HealthHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.