Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Accuracy of vital sign monitoring using a photoplethysmography upper arm wearable device in postoperative non-cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational clinical validation study.
Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data availability and usability of a remote device for vital sign monitoring on general wards and home: a single-center prospective, observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment in a continuously monitored surgical ward: Diagnostic performance of wearable-derived early warning scores.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of a novel accelerometer-based respiratory rate monitor.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Remote Monitoring With a Reusable Device Upon Implementation on a Surgical Department (REQUEST Trial).World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring with a Wireless and Wearable Earsensor in Surgical Patients: A Clinical Validation Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vital sign monitoring in patients is essential for the early detection of deterioration of vital signs and timely medical intervention especially on general wards in hospitals. Traditionally performed manually and intermittently, wearable monitoring devices offer a promising alternative by automatically providing real-time, continuous data. In this prospective observational study in non-cardiac surgery patients, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) measurements obtained from a photoplethysmography (PPG)-based upper arm wearable device viQtor® (smartQare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), by simultaneously comparing its readings with standard monitoring equipment in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Capnography was included as the gold-standard reference for RR. Agreement between the wearable and reference measurements were assessed using Bland–Altman analyses. Clinical accuracy was evaluated using Clarke Error Grid analyses. Vital sign data were collected from 42 postoperative patients (age: 65.5 years [IQR 37.4–74.7]; BMI: 24.1 kg/m2 [IQR 21.7–26.9]) over a median duration of 14.0 hours. The Average Root Mean Square (ARMS) between the wearable device and the reference for RR was 2.85 BRPM, with a bias of -0.40 (95% LoA –5.85 to 5.04); for HR 2.01 BPM, with a bias of 0.08 (95% LoA -3.83 to 3.99); and for SpO2 2.08%, with a bias of –0.03 (95% LoA –4.14 to 4.09). The viQtor® device demonstrated high accuracy for RR, HR, and SpO₂ in postoperative patients. Data availability was high across all three parameters, and patient satisfaction was excellent. These findings support its potential for continuous monitoring on general wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.