ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
International survey on the management of pectus excavatum: is there a consensus?
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise impairment in patients with pectus excavatum? A scoping review of evidence and role of arterial content change during effort.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity. While often perceived as a cosmetic issue, PE can impair cardiopulmonary function. Surgical correction has evolved from the Ravitch procedure to the minimally invasive Nuss technique, which offers reduced surgical risks and improved postoperative outcomes. However, diagnostic and therapeutic variability persists, highlighting the need for expert consensus.
methodsA 31-question web-based survey was distributed to CWIG members and PE specialists between November 2024 and January 2025. The survey explored five key domains: demographics, preoperative evaluation, surgical indications and timing, operative technique, and postoperative management. Responses from 100 international surgeons were analyzed.
resultsThe most common indications for surgery were severe deformity (88.9%), Haller index > 3.25 (78.8%), psychosocial distress (77.8%), and symptoms (77.8%). Technique selection was influenced by prior surgery (48%) and surgeon experience (45.9%). For complex cases, 90.8% preferred the double-bar technique. Most surgeons removed the bar within 2-3 years (86.6%). Postoperative pain was primarily managed with oral analgesics (64.6%) and IV pumps (47.5%). Early complications included pneumothorax (68.1%) and infections (62.8%); bar displacement (78%) was the most frequent late complication.
conclusionDespite widespread adoption of the Nuss procedure, significant variation remains in PE management. These findings emphasize the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.