ArticleSpine deformity2026
Three novel orbito-cervical parameters: highly repeatable and simple measurements of horizontal gaze.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this single centre radiographic study on healthy volunteers was to evaluate three novel orbito-cervical parameters in a population of healthy volunteers and calculate the observer agreements and errors for these parameters.
methodsThe cohort comprised 126 healthy adult volunteers, 88 females and 38 males, aged 33.6 ± 12.0, with full-spine sagittal radiographs and no history of back and/or neck pain, spine and/or lower limb pathologies, or spine and/or hip surgeries. The following were measured on radiographs: C1-slope (C1S), orbito-cervical tilt (OCT), orbito-cervical incidence (OCI), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), McGregor's slope (McGS), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between all radiographic measurements.
resultsC1S was 9.8 ± 6.6°(range, 0.1-29.1), OCT was 66.7 ± 6.9°(range, 48.7-82.0), and OCI was 75.9 ± 7.2°(range, 52.5-89.8). All measurements had excellent observer agreements (ICC > 0.900) and low observer errors (MAE < 2.5). OCI strongly correlated with C1S + OCT (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). OCT strongly correlated with McGregor's slope (r = - 0.78, p < 0.001), moderately correlated with CBVA (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), but weakly correlated with OCI (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). C1S moderately correlated with OCT (r = - 0.51, p < 0.001), OCI (r = 0.5, p < 0.001), CBVA (r = - 0.52, p < 0.001), and McGregor's slope (r = 0.64, p < 0.001).
conclusionOCI is strongly correlated with C1S + OCT and these orbito-cervical parameters are to some extent correlated with existing sagittal cervical parameters. Furthermore, they have excellent observer agreements (ICC > 0.900) and low inter- and intra- observer errors (MAE < 2.5). The authors recommend the use of these orbito-cervical parameters in clinical practice to provide a better understanding of horizontal gaze, leading to improved preoperative planning for spinal fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982099What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.