ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Prolonged venous transit - where venous outflow meets financial outflow: a cost analysis.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHealthcare costs in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS-LVO) patients vary widely despite achieving successful reperfusion. Prolonged venous transit (PVT+) is a new marker of poor venous outflow on pretreatment perfusion imaging associated with various patient outcomes. We aim to explore the relationship between PVT + and acute care cost estimates for AIS-LVO.
methodsAdult AIS-LVO patients achieving successful reperfusion with thrombectomy at three centers in the United States were retrospectively reviewed. Cost estimates were derived from national averages for services in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data (2025). The primary outcome was total cost estimates for acute intervention, imaging, and post-treatment inpatient care until discharge. Estimates were compared between PVT + and PVT- cohorts.
resultsIn 109 included patients, the median age was 71 years (IQR 62-80). The cost estimates for total acute stroke care were significantly greater by $11787 in PVT + patients (median $36601 [IQR $24814-$72944] than PVT- patients (median $24814 [IQR $16956-$48388], p = 0.03). Cost of post-treatment care was significantly greater in PVT + patients than PVT- patients (p = 0.03).
conclusionPVT + demonstrates potential as a useful, versatile pretreatment biomarker, in conjunction with other clinical data, to anticipate in-hospital resources and costs associated with acute stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.