ArticleOecologia2025
Mechanisms for perennial grass dominance under small herbivore exclusion in an Inner Mongolian grassland.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbivores significantly influence plant communities by modifying interspecies relationships, which in turn impacts ecosystem functioning. Although excluding herbivores is expected to enhance the dominance of perennial plants, few studies have consistently explored how plants adjust the growth-defense-reproduction trade-off in response to changes at different stages of herbivore exclusion. We conducted a controlled fence experiment in Inner Mongolia grassland to examine the effects of vole exclusion on the dominance and adaptation strategies of two perennial grasses. We found that twelve years of Brandt's vole grazing altered the plant community composition, but in the second year of the exclusion experiment, Leymus chinensis quickly regained its dominance. This rapid recovery was facilitated by L. chinensis strategically shifting its growth-defense-reproduction investment over time. In the early exclusion phase, L. chinensis quickly enhanced its competitive edge by prioritizing vegetative growth and clonal reproduction. As the exclusion period progressed, the species transitioned to seed-based dispersal to enhance population fitness. In contrast, the dominance of Cleistogenes squarrosa was largely influenced by interspecific interactions rather than intrinsic adaptive changes. These results reveal plants can dynamically adjust their resource investment strategies to optimize population fitness at different stages of vegetation recovery. This enhances our understanding of plant community dynamics and the establishment and maintenance of dominant species in grassland ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982058What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.