ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Gemfibrozil's cytotoxicity and DNA protection: PPAR-α agonism overrides genotoxicity in lymphocytes.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fibrates, carboxylic acid derivatives used in hypercholesterolemia treatment, are classified as non-genotoxic carcinogens. However, induce oxidative stress and DNA damage. This study investigates the genotoxic effects of gemfibrozil (GMF), a hypolipidemic agent, on human peripheral blood lymphocytes through cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) and alkaline comet assays. Plasmid DNA (pBR322) assessed GMF's DNA protective effects, while total oxidant (TOS) and antioxidant (TAS) status quantified oxidative stress modulation. Molecular docking simulations evaluated non-covalent interactions of GMF against DNA and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α). At 25-250 µg/mL, GMF did not induce micronuclei (24-48 h) but triggered significant DNA fragmentation at 250 µg/mL (p < 0.01). GMF significantly reduced cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) across all concentrations and durations (p < 0.001), except 25 µg/mL (48 h). In a cell-free system, GMF exhibited a complex, bimodal protective effect against H₂O₂-induced plasmid damage, offering protection at 25 and 175 µg/mL but not at 100 µg/mL. However, TOS/TAS levels remained unaltered. Molecular docking demonstrated weak DNA binding (ΔG = -5.93 kcal/mol) compared to mitomycin C (ΔG = -7.25 kcal/mol), but strong PPAR-α affinity (ΔG = -7.40 kcal/mol). These findings suggest GMF exerts cytotoxicity via disrupted cell division kinetics rather than direct DNA damage or oxidative stress. Despite a low genotoxic risk of GMF in vitro. In vivo studies are critical to confirm safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40982002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.