Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981990›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Machine learning predicts severe adverse events and salvage success of CT-guided lung biopsy after nondiagnostic transbronchial lung biopsy.

Song Yang, Zhidan Hua, Yiming Chen, Lisha Liu, Zhengkai Wang, Yixian Cheng, Jing Wang, Zhixiao Xu, Chengshui Chen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Song Yang *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Zhidan Hua *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Yiming Chen *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Lisha LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Zhengkai WangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China.
Yixian ChengEndoscopy Center, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Jing WangEndoscopy Center, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Zhixiao XuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. xuzhixiao@wmu.edu.cn.
Chengshui ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Zhejiang Province Engineering Research Center for Endoscope Instruments and Technology Development, Quzhou People's Hospital, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, China. chenchengshui@wmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-9911

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFC1304000The National Natural Scientific Foundation of China 82170017,82370085Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program 2020C03067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo address the unmet clinical need for validated risk stratification tools in salvage CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy (PNLB) following nondiagnostic transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB). We aimed to develop machine learning models predicting severe adverse events (SAEs) in PNLB (Model 1) and diagnostic success of salvage PNLB post-TBLB failure (Model 2). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis multicenter predictive modeling study enrolled 2910 cases undergoing PNLB across two centers (Center 1: n = 2653 (2016-2020); Center 2: n = 257 (2017-2022)) with complete imaging and clinical documentation meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Key variables were selected via LASSO regression, followed by development and validation of Model 1 (incorporating sex, smoking, pleural contact, lesion size, and puncture depth) and Model 2 (including age, lesion size, lesion characteristics, and post-bronchoscopic pathological categories (PBPCs)) using ten machine learning algorithms. Model performance was rigorously evaluated through discrimination metrics, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis to assess clinical applicability.

resultsA total of 2653 and 257 PNLB cases were included from two centers, where Model 1 achieved external validation ROC-AUC 0.717 (95% CI: 0.609-0.825) and PR-AUC 0.258 (95% CI: 0.0365-0.708), while Model 2 exhibited ROC-AUC 0.884 (95% CI: 0.784-0.984) and PR-AUC 0.852 (95% CI: 0.784-0.896), with XGBoost outperforming other algorithms.

conclusionThe dual XGBoost system stratifies salvage PNLB candidates by quantifying SAE risks (AUC = 0.717) versus diagnostic yield (AUC = 0.884), addressing the unmet need for personalized biopsy pathway optimization. KEY POINTS: Question Current tools cannot quantify severe adverse event (SAE) risks versus salvage diagnostic success for CT-guided lung biopsy (PNLB) after failed transbronchial biopsy (TBLB). Findings Dual XGBoost models successfully predicted the risks of PNLB SAEs (AUC = 0.717) and diagnostic success post-TBLB failure (AUC = 0.884) with validated clinical stratification benefits. Clinical relevance The dual XGBoost system guides clinical decision-making by integrating individual risk of SAEs with predictors of diagnostic success, enabling personalized salvage biopsy strategies that balance safety and diagnostic yield.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyLungLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedBronchoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyBiopsy (Needle)BronchoscopyMachine learningRisk assessmentSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.