Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981728›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2025

Snapchat Artificial Intelligence as an Information Source on Delta-8 THC.

Cassidy R LoParco, Kayla K Tillett, Ayyüce Begüm Bektaş, Matthew E Rossheim, Carla J Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassidy R LoParcoDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.. Electronic address: Cassidy.LoParco@gwu.edu.
Kayla K TillettDepartment of Health Administration and Health Policy, College of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Ayyüce Begüm BektaşDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Matthew E RossheimDepartment of Health Administration and Health Policy, College of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
Carla J BergDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.

Funding

Socio-structural determinants of cannabis and derived psychoactive cannabis product use and consequences among young adultsF32DA060612 · NIDA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LOPARCO, CASSIDY R · 2024 to 2025
$101k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA060612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSnapchat is a prominent social media site among youth. In April 2023, Snapchat released an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot that was automatically implemented on all accounts. Given the apparent ease in communicating with this feature, youth may use it as an information source.

methodsWhile Snapchat purports to block results for drug keywords, it is unclear the extent to which this type of content is blocked. In August 2024-January 2025, we asked Snapchat AI questions related to delta-8, a derived intoxicating cannabis product that has been rapidly rising in popularity in the United States and has limited regulations. Qualitative responses were independently coded into thematic categories.

resultsThe AI prompted individuals to ask follow-up questions, which largely drove the themes. Themes included general information (similarity to delta-9 THC, but with a purported lower potency; relaxing/euphoric effects; legality), use motives (pain relief, anti-nausea, appetite stimulation, anxiety reduction), potential consequences (dry mouth, red eyes, increased heart rate, drowsiness, contaminated products, inaccurate labeling), retail availability, and product recommendations. Responses did not provide supporting citations. While the AI did not block results related to delta-8, it did block results pertaining to "weed" and "THC." DISCUSSION: Snapchat AI is a plausible information source about delta-8 THC among youth. No citations were provided to support claims made by the AI, which portrayed delta-8 THC use favorably, as having benefits and low risks from use. Findings have policy implications, including restricting or regulating this type of content-particularly relating to claims without supporting scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDronabinolSocial MediaAdolescentHumansInformation SourcesUnited StatesDronabinolAICannabisDelta-8Social mediaYouth

Identifiers

PMID40981728
PMCPMC13043180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.