Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981683›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025

Menopausal symptoms after hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy: a pilot study.

Anne-Sophie Maryns, Tjalina Hamerlynck, Bart De Vree, Anne-Sophie Verboven, Amin P Makar, Philippe Tummers, Wiebren Tjalma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne-Sophie MarynsClinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, ZAS Middelheim Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6471-8116
Tjalina HamerlynckDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bart De VreeClinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, ZAS Middelheim Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anne-Sophie VerbovenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Amin P MakarDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Philippe TummersDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Wiebren TjalmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinic of Multidisciplinary Breast, Gynecological Oncology Unit, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy during hysterectomy with ovarian preservation may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, but concerns remain that adding salpingectomy to hysterectomy could affect ovarian vascularisation and subsequent function. Objectives: To assess the feasibility of a full-scale trial to evaluate changes in menopausal symptoms based on the menopause rating scale (MRS) six months following hysterectomy, with and without opportunistic salpingectomy. Methods: A prospective observational pilot study of premenopausal women age 40 to 55 years scheduled for hysterectomy with ovarian preservation was conducted, where participants were counselled and given the option of concomitant salpingectomy or not. Main Outcome Measures: Forty-six out of 50 women chose opportunistic salpingectomy. It took 17 months to recruit 50 patients. Complete follow-up data was achieved in 43 of the 50 participants. Results: The median MRS score remained unchanged in the opportunistic salpingectomy group at 9 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-14], both before surgery and six months afterwards (n=39). In contrast, the group of women who did not undergo opportunistic salpingectomy had a median MRS score of 11 (IQR: 3-16) preoperatively, which increased to 25 (IQR: 6-32) six months postoperatively (n=4). Conclusions: The majority of patients in our cohort opted for opportunistic salpingectomy. However, no deterioration in menopausal symptoms was observed in this group after six months. A randomised controlled trial comparing hysterectomy with and without opportunistic salpingectomy in this patient population may not be feasible, given the strong patient preference for salpingectomy and slow recruitment. What is New?: The development of subjective menopausal symptoms is evaluated after hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy.

Indexed as

Hysterectomymenopausemenopause rating scaleMRSopportunistic salpingectomy

Identifiers

PMID40981683
PMCPMC12489259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.