Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40981486›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2025

Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion for Patients With Septic Shock Requiring High-Dose Norepinephrine: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Yu Kawazoe, Kyohei Miyamoto, Noriko Miyagawa, Yoshinori Ohta, Hitoshi Yamamura, Takuya Kimura, Yukitoshi Toyoda, Michihito Kyo, Tetsuya Sato, Masashi Kinjo and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yu KawazoeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-4788
Kyohei MiyamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Noriko MiyagawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshinori OhtaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoshi YamamuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takuya KimuraDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Yukitoshi ToyodaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hiratsuka City Hospital, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Michihito KyoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tetsuya SatoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Masashi KinjoDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Masaki TakahashiDivision of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Junichi MaruyamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazunori FukushimaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsuuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Prefectural Nakakawachi Emergency and Critical Care Center, Higashi-Osaka, Japan.
Satoru MurataDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Tomoya OkazakiDepartment of Emergency Medical Center, Kagawa University Hospital, Kida, Japan.
Toshihiro SakuraiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tsuyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Tasuku HanajimaDepartment of Trauma and Reconstruction Center, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
Gaku TakahashiDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Takeshi MorimotoDepartment of Data Science, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePolymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) is a potential therapeutic option for sepsis; however, its clinical effects remain unclear.

objectiveWe explored the association between PMX-HP and clinical outcomes in patients in ICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis is a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in 20 ICUs in Japan between 2020 and 2022. Patients with septic shock requiring high-dose norepinephrine (≥ 0.2 µg/kg/min) were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between those who received PMX-HP (PMX group) and those who did not (non-PMX group). A primary outcome was 28-day mortality, with secondary outcomes including changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and vasoactive-inotropic score over time in the initial 48 hours, 28-day vasopressor-free days, and 90-day mortality rate.

resultsAmong 309 patients, 175 (56.6%) were males, with a median age of 72 years and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of 26. Overall, 82 patients underwent PMX-HP. The PMX and non-PMX groups had similar median ages (71 vs. 73 yr) and APACHE II scores (26 vs. 27). The median PMX-HP duration was 1016 minutes. The 28-day mortality was similar between the groups (PMX group: 17.1%, non-PMX group: 18.9%, p = 0.71), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.46-1.68). MAP was maintained at a higher level with low-dose vasopressor from 8 to 32 hours following admission in the PMX group. The PMX group had fewer 28-day ICU-free days (16 vs. 18, p = 0.026). The 90-day mortality rate was similar between the groups (PMX group, 23.5%; non-PMX group, 27.1%; p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: PMX-HP was not associated with the 28-day mortality improvement but was associated with higher MAP and lower vasopressor use for 8-32 hours of admission. Our findings suggested that PMX-HP requires careful adaptation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHemoperfusionNorepinephrinePolymyxin BShock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedAPACHEFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsJapanMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsNorepinephrinePolymyxin BVasoconstrictor Agentsendotoxinhemoperfusionlong durationpolymyxin Bseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID40981486
PMCPMC12456497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.